|
Post by Kensterberg on Oct 5, 2005 11:25:58 GMT -5
Excellent, and extremely thoughtful, post there Phil.
There's a very good book review on the effect of porn-chic on today's women over at Salon.com. Highly recommended ... just click on "site pass" to read everything there for free.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 5, 2005 13:17:09 GMT -5
Excellent, and extremely thoughtful, post there Phil.
Ken ~ Thank you... !
Bottom line is, speaking only for myself, I find for example, japanese erotic art and David Hamilton artistic pictures of young girls very erotic while a crude porno movie with close-up shots of "genitalias in full motion" does really nothing for me ...
IMO, there lies the difference between eroticism and "pornography" ...
The firsts appeal to your brain while the second is aimed much more lower...
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 5, 2005 15:45:04 GMT -5
It is either a slow posting day or Ken, Mary and I just killed this board ...
|
|
|
Post by shin on Oct 5, 2005 15:53:06 GMT -5
I have some things I could add to the conversation on pornography, but if pasting comics aren't allowed, I don't think this will be either.
|
|
|
Post by kmc on Oct 5, 2005 16:45:30 GMT -5
This board can't work without Melon. It isn't that Mary, Phil, and Ken killed it. It's just that the Lord has called Melon to do His holy work elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by strat-0 on Oct 5, 2005 19:05:40 GMT -5
Now, Shin, nobody said that the posting of comics was flatly "not allowed." There was definitely another dynamic at work back there. But posting of actual hardcore porn (not racy or titillating pics) can get the site shut down by proboards. But I think everybody knows better than that anyway.
FTR, I don't know what happened to Someone, but it wasn't me.
|
|
|
Post by shin on Oct 5, 2005 19:10:50 GMT -5
I was just making a joke
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Oct 5, 2005 19:19:46 GMT -5
So could I comment on how I think Miers is going to turn out to be super conservative (Pat Robertson is endorsing her for crying out loud) and then end the post with a nudie pic?
|
|
|
Post by Rit on Oct 5, 2005 19:48:42 GMT -5
yes.
|
|
|
Post by strat-0 on Oct 5, 2005 19:48:45 GMT -5
Of Miers?
|
|
|
Post by shin on Oct 5, 2005 19:50:33 GMT -5
If that were true, Robertson wouldn't endorse her.
....or WOULD he?
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Oct 5, 2005 19:50:56 GMT -5
Jesus God, no! I was thinking maybe I could try to find some pictures of a nice young girl in judges robes (mostly)...maybe a powdered wig and perhaps a gavel that she could...Ok ok no gavel.
|
|
|
Post by Rit on Oct 5, 2005 19:51:29 GMT -5
i would perfer a nudie pic not of Miers, if possible, Ded. thanks, bro.
|
|
|
Post by strat-0 on Oct 5, 2005 19:57:35 GMT -5
Hey, sexagenarians need love too.
|
|
|
Post by Rit on Oct 5, 2005 20:06:08 GMT -5
what i got ain't love..
|
|