|
|
Post by skovrecky on Mar 21, 2008 11:09:38 GMT -5
^ Thorns, that because you are awesome.....I'll hug you back but I will not touch your peen though. That would be a little too much love.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Mar 21, 2008 11:52:18 GMT -5
LMAO . . . yes, that is appreciated. Manhugs rock ! ok that's enuff gayness. *puts on Slayer for compensation* / *re-assumes mandly mode*  |
|
|
|
Post by ken on Mar 21, 2008 12:14:47 GMT -5
You two get a room.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Mar 21, 2008 12:50:34 GMT -5
*bats manlashes @ skvorry*
|
|
|
|
Post by skovrecky on Mar 21, 2008 13:43:30 GMT -5
Alright, fine, me and Thorny are now getting a Civil Union.
Purrrrrrr....
|
|
|
|
Post by ken on Mar 21, 2008 14:09:32 GMT -5
I don't know if the laws here allow for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Mar 21, 2008 17:24:33 GMT -5
RocDoc, the correct response to kenny is to realize that he's making fun of you for being a longtime Bush/war supporter, that for all your attempt to whittle your pomp and oh-so-cultural observations into supposedly razor-sharp observations, you still wound up on the pig-ass-fucking wrong side of history of the defining event of our time, and that you have neither the intellectual nor moral ground to be making snide remarks to him in return. In other words, you're owned, and shut up.Well, I have to just allow you this one, man. I mean, I pretty much agree with you on this one. It’s just sad that you have decided to cast yourself as the unrelenting brownshirt here. And don’t try to point the finger somewhere else and shout, “j’accuse!” Just own this one, man. If you’re big enough. I wish you two could be capable of a little good nature once in a while. Just a little. It doesn’t cost you a thing. Not a thing… hmmm. whoa, no-one can spare a bit of generosity of spirit to allow ME to just inject a fucking joke too?? to rib kenny's manic all-satire-all-the-time posting? 'snide' or not, WHY give a fuck?. notice please that i do NOT come here anymore anyway. but then to read this issuance of his corrective proscriptions of how one must react to the sedaka-boys? motherfucking balls. you, and then amp, both. you're both fucking nuts. ce is just absurdly predictable here. this pre-election analytical hoo-ha is barely interesting las vegas-styled horseshit that i sure have next-to-zero to say about, because i simply just don't fucking care. and then to just pick up and slam me with this rank stupidity of assigning some sort of pre-set litany of 'doc-represents-this-this-this-ALways' just confirms this obvious blanket self-congratulatory shallowness. i dare to post here, you jump me. right. yes, yes by all means, you go, warrior shin. ..neither the intellectual nor moral ground..ha! my god, hail the dicksuck arbiter. please go fuck yourself...and just let this place languish and (*back of hand to forehead dramatically*) die as you've wished, ok? |
|
|
|
Post by maarts on Mar 21, 2008 17:37:45 GMT -5
But yeah maarts, nothing malicious there, man. You and I were just having a bit of fun at no expense. Have a good day. Same to you bro'- you were right, didn't 'beat' you in there. Was all in good fun. Yeah, I realise that those little asides are not really appreciated across the bystanders. Rather see the civil wars here more reduced to friendly fire over and back on the subject matter. So I apologise to the readership here. |
|
|
|
Post by shin on Mar 21, 2008 19:03:09 GMT -5
Guess in the 5+ years you have been communicating with me you haven't been able to figure me out yet. In the 5+ years I've been communicating with you, I've taken you to be something of a wet blanket, so it was well within my estimation that you were not getting the joke, as wet blankets are wont to do. I concede that I may have erred in my estimation. Cheers. And strat, do you go to bed at night wondering what you're missing over at Sedaka? Let me assuage your overwhelming curiosity: threads dedicated to stolen trash bins, zombie parties, dolphin gangrapes, Bo Bice avatars, and the estimated size of Obama's genitals (current surveys place him at approximately 9 inches). I'm sure that makes you all the more eager to join, but pleased be advised that it is a communal decision, and no one is above the whim of the Clique. |
|
|
|
Post by maarts on Mar 21, 2008 19:45:12 GMT -5
Shin- a wet blanket! That's funny. I consider you to be a shitstirrer- only interested in staying here for shits and giggles, getting a raise out of people who you don't respect. You want to have fun regardless the cost and damn the person objecting to it. You were apt at it at RS, you haven't changed a bit.
The fact is that I got the joke- you didn't get my joke. Kenny got it. Guess you're not so smart as you think you are.
As far as Sedaka goes; I sincerely wish you all the fun of the world there, judging by the subjects it's still Comedy Central and a bit lightweight for me. By all means, if any Sedakians want to indulge in something heartier....step right up.
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisfan on Mar 21, 2008 22:08:28 GMT -5
So on the topic this board is meant to be about ... www.bercasio.com/movies/dems-wmd-before-iraq.wmv Are all of these people - especially the pre-2002 quotes - full of shit, or is the way history has been re-written since 2004 what is full of shit? |
|
|
|
Post by ken on Mar 21, 2008 23:00:29 GMT -5
You tell'em, Chrisfan!
|
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 21, 2008 23:20:24 GMT -5
They should all have listened to Dick Cheney back in 1994 ... Cheney '94: Invading Baghdad Would Create Quagmire C-SPAwww.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-IThe bottom line is that those responsable for invading Irak KNEW by March 2003, before going in, that Saddam had no WMDs, no uranium and no ties to 9/11 and Al Qaeda ... |
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 21, 2008 23:30:01 GMT -5
*We have irrefutable proofs* ...
It's a war ... based on little more than lies and deception.
... researchers from the Washington DC-based Center for Public Integrity have completed an exhaustive study of the Bush Administration's case for the Iraq war. The Center's executive director, Bill Buzenberg, says they found eight top officials made at least 935 false claims – among them, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was linked directly to Al Qaida.
There are few surprises about who made the most false statements in the run-up to the March 2003 invasion: President Bush topped the list with 260 while Secretary of State Colin Powell was second with 254. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer each made 109 false statements. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz was next with 85, followed by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice (56), Vice President Dick Cheney (48), and White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan (14).
Buzenberg says the false statements were made on 532 separate occasions, "So, this was not a small…misstatement a few times; this was very clear orchestration."
Whether or not the Administration's false statements were calculated lies is something Buzenberg leaves to the public to decide. But he rejects the claim the Bush Administration made after the war – that it just had false, or bad, intelligence.
|
|
|
|
Post by shin on Mar 22, 2008 5:17:06 GMT -5
As far as Sedaka goes; I sincerely wish you all the fun of the world there, judging by the subjects it's still Comedy Central and a bit lightweight for me. By all means, if any Sedakians want to indulge in something heartier....step right up. Well there are the threads we have currently focused on various dead friends and family members. You know, outpouring of grief and sympathy and such. At first I felt it to be none of anyones' business, so I didn't originally bring it up, but I don't want there to be any confusion. That said, I assure you that low-brow hijinx nonetheless ensue in these threads, so never fear. Horn honking, booger picking, poop jokes, all that stuff. Our little sandbox of spoiled brats remains as unkempt as ever. But should there ever come a time that "RIP John Kudla, Sr." ever becomes too serious for Sedaka, it's nice to know that you're keeping the carpet rolled out for us. Everyone needs a place to turn to. |
|
