|
Post by Ryosuke on Aug 3, 2007 2:18:45 GMT -5
It wasn't me, I swear!
|
|
|
Post by JesusLooksLikeMe on Aug 3, 2007 2:26:02 GMT -5
Seriously- who did edit strat's Wiki-entry? As chance would have it, I actually discovered the answer to this question today and would be quite prepared to divulge this information in return for you YSI'ing me Willard Grant Conspiracy's Flying Low.
|
|
|
Post by maarts on Aug 3, 2007 2:40:41 GMT -5
Sorry, no can do. I do not own said recording.
|
|
|
Post by JesusLooksLikeMe on Aug 3, 2007 3:05:15 GMT -5
Anything by NFD? Or any other Nephilim spin-off band? PM me a list of possible offers. Let's see if we can reach a deal.
|
|
|
Post by maarts on Aug 3, 2007 3:25:00 GMT -5
Nephilim spinoffs? Err, eh, none really. Possible offers? Got about 3000 CDs and 120 downloads on tap- can't think of what you might like right now.
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Aug 3, 2007 4:18:19 GMT -5
Does it matter who edited it? If it was someone you liked it might ok?
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Aug 3, 2007 12:09:50 GMT -5
shin says something like this:
It's just an arrogant exercise. It would be amusing if you didn't take it so seriously, but you clearly do. Lighten up. Who cares about whether or not Galactus is mentioned? Take the sticks out of your asses. Seriously.
...seriously throwing down the accusations of 'arrogance' and the mortal sin of 'seriousness' as usual.....while remaining all serious himself when the truth of the matter of his every stray comment here, his never-ending 'snark' is exposed, again...being serious is just a mask shin (and just there, ded) put on and take off for proper effect...and when it suits them, PR masters that they've been. geniuses making the 'sudden' invite of former sedaka black-ball-ees like mary and ken a cause to say 'look! we like all of you! well except for well, there's a, b, and c...but you're in cos we say you're kewl and fuck those others 'k?. high five me now'
anyway why are you playing the serious face here. ded? listen to shin and 'lighten up' dude! spill.
be fecking proud of who wrote it and don't give two shits what anyone thinks for someone who simply perpetuated yet another 'arrogant exercise' at wiki!
at least everyone at sedaka thinks it was kewl, don't they?
why be serious (ha!) about what someone else here may think?
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Aug 3, 2007 12:11:05 GMT -5
why would you give a shit what maarts thinks?
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Aug 3, 2007 12:32:18 GMT -5
So you're really just mad because we never invited you? If we're that big of a disturbance strat can just ban us, can't he? Come to think of it why hasn't he? I mean we are just putrid little shit that just pop up to cause trouble right? No more no less, eh? No way you guys could be missing something. We do give a about what Maarts thinks...we did actually invite him to sedaka at one point, but I think he's made his feeling clear since then. So now what? We slink off, tail betwixt our legs? You're constant attempts to shame the sedakaites are ridiculous and baseless. You have idea what happens over there and that's really the issue isn't it? If it were open and you could put your fears to rest that we're not constantly plotting and it drives you crazy that several, people previously thought of as "cool" would be accepted and accept that filthy other board. Indeed we discuss how everything we do will look over here..."oh goodness, what will rocdoc think when we invite Mary! teehee" Yes, we say tee hee a lot. Strange how she still posts there even after we told her we were just using her to mess with you, it's all just to mess with you. Why does it matter who wrote it? It's just another thing you can hold against sedaka as a whole isn't it? Guilt by association and all right? Shame on ryo and kool and weeping and all the other cool people this board (the one true board) rightly owns, have they no loyalty? Our brainwashing machines are state of the art, seriously impressive stuff.
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Aug 3, 2007 15:46:38 GMT -5
so maarts finding out who wrote the wiki piece would hurt his feelings or disappoint him in some way then? c'mon spill. it can't be that serious, right?
So you're really just mad because we never invited you?
what? there's balls. simple jealousy of that? hoo-haaa. never would have i wanted to be a part of that. it'd be unimaginable since you've burned my bridge since like forever....tho gawd it'd be nice to tell you 'nofuckno'.
you're not but, just in case, and you can quote me, do NOT bother.
You're constant attempts to shame the sedakaites are ridiculous and baseless.
the 'sedakaites', one and all ? no just the putrid little juveniles who started it up....
and 'baseless'? um, no. your yearslong exclusions of various people, the flatout blackballing of truly above-your-average people like ken and of mary (until the based-on-fact shame of such pindick blatantly insecure behavior gave you 'founders' a black eye here...when you began flaunting some sorta supposed superiority here) is plenty to base your shame on.
when the questions arose of why not ken? and further that 'they 'REJECTED' him', yet? and the same with why not mary, then people who hadn't the slightest idea of the sedaka history (or existence) were quickly invited ('kool, check your pms') before everything went negative on your loutish asses. baseless you say?
a disingenuous goddamned company man to a fault, you are, if you're convinced that the previous paragraph ain't shit, ain't nothing to feel the least bit shamed.... other than 'it was our propitty to do with as we wanted...backwoods incestuously insular was good, right shin?'...ok well fine, then.
and i 'constantly' harp on your shame? bullshit. only when some stupid such shit debate pops up and it DESERVES to be brought up again.
i do not fucking care about any of you, you see.
shin jumped my ass a few weeks back and I was completely sincere in my statement that if he (and all you fucks aligned like this with him) were never to comment on a word I say ever again, i'll be perfectly satisfied. better yet delete all your fucking accounts like i wish he would. because you're determined never again to take a word of mine at face value, it is very plain. and that, well, you suck.
welll you're the mainstream here now, absolutely.
lots of excellent wonderful people participating there who i've known from here, yes.
but your less-than-auspicious or in any way benevolent founding principles, known by manymanymany here (and some who are now absent from here) and whitewashed by you as best can be, still doesn't begin to hide the rotten core from which the now sparkly clean (yet still pretty fucking insular) sedaka group came.
congratulations with all sincerity.
now keep your side of this so bloody UNserious chestthumping discussion to a whisper and it'll all be ok.
practice what shin was preaching up there, eh? so what is it serious, or isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by Paul on Aug 3, 2007 16:04:37 GMT -5
I don't have much to say here (I kinda like everyone here) I don't really chat/hang/know the Sedaka crew too well, but I gotta admit I love reading this shit.
Happy Friday everyone.
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Aug 3, 2007 16:25:31 GMT -5
You're peach doc, as though the absolute refusal to accept the other as any more than scoundrel is one sided. I ask again then, what difference does it make who wrote it? Explain and I'll be more then happy to tell you who it was.
Doc, and I do not speak for shin only for me, if you can find an instance where I have attacked you before you included me in some inane rant or taken a pot shot at me...any ole instance in, say, the last the year where I have attacked you first I will delete my account here.
|
|
|
Post by shin on Aug 3, 2007 16:49:08 GMT -5
Well, for one it might direct a few lost souls who posted on the old RS in the past to this board and even to yours? To whatever extent this is true (and I would argue that it's easier to google search for a name of a poster that will result in these boards than the off chance that someone says to themselves "gosh I miss the ol' boys, wonder if Wikipedia mentions them at all"), the fact still remains that it doesn't belong on the Wiki page of the magazine. Even at the height of RS.com's powers, at the most 200 people were involved on a regular basis, all told. MAYBE 400, if I'm being generous. It's simply a vanity entry that doesn't match the strict standards the Wiki mods have, so any minute that Strat's entry exists is a minute more than can be reasonably expected. There are websites such as slashdot.org, 4chan.org, etc. with a vast message board community with far reaching implications on the web at large that deserve to be included in Wikipedia. On the other hand, here we are, these two little islands that interact in our silly little "wars", and one of us goes out and makes mention of that fact, and we have to huff and puff about it. Yeah, it's a cute, innovative project to engage in, and like I said before, I tried to do a version of it myself. I got REAL mad when the Wiki mods deleted it, and you know what? I thought about it and realized it was foolish of me to expect anything less. We could all use a minute or two of putting things in perspective. To be angry at all at a Sedakan (who is not me) for "vandalism" is a blessing, as it shouldn't be there to edit at all.
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Aug 3, 2007 17:01:53 GMT -5
You're peach doc, as though the absolute refusal to accept the other as any more than scoundrel is one sided. I ask again then, what difference does it make who wrote it? Explain and I'll be more then happy to tell you who it was.
tho i have no idea what the first sentence has to do with the next (actually not much of what it even means), the 'what's the diff' answer is that maarts asked and he was the one interested to know. and you for some reason seem to be saying that you're protecting him (ie We do give a about what Maarts thinks...)
hey! i thought we're all about 'unserious' here...what's the diff if maarts knows?
what could be more unserious than someone taking strat's well-intended work and turning into something like the 'bigger dick' contest that slark/mateus characterized this as? and then taking credit for it! it'd be such a larf! a lark even!
~
did i include you in this without you mentioning me ever by name? you say you have no affiliation with shin, not even as this apologist you certainly seem to be for his sedaka creation? well then, geez, oops sorry.
but nor was any of this 'inane'. oh, the truth when it's pointed out may be inane to the person who'd rather forget about it. i addressed what shin was talking about, calmly, rationally....and the dbl standard inherent in when he (and you, always) says 'Oh don't be so serious!' when he's the one that's made the bfd out of it to begin with...neither of you likes to be answered in kind especially when you now see that sedaka's made such a fine 'recovery'
and re your 'offer', it has happened, but i definitely don't have the time to help you out of here.
the power's in you. ask kenny, ask rocky how they did it...and then be strong.
|
|
|
Post by Fuzznuts on Aug 3, 2007 17:04:44 GMT -5
I don't have much to say here (I kinda like everyone here) I don't really chat/hang/know the Sedaka crew too well, but I gotta admit I love reading this shit. Happy Friday everyone. You probably know more Sedakas than you realize.
|
|