|
|
Post by chrisfan on Aug 4, 2007 9:42:49 GMT -5
I say twins - one of each.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matheus on Aug 4, 2007 9:48:02 GMT -5
Twins! That would be amazing. Personally, I think she's going to have a girl, but that's simply my opinion.
Speaking of girls, Michelle Duggar blasted another girl out. Even though the Duggars are kinda cool, they're very creepy at the same time. 17 kids? I wouldn't call that a gift from God, I'd call it a curse from Satan, but that's just me.
|
|
|
|
Post by samplestiltskin on Aug 4, 2007 10:01:44 GMT -5
17 children? those parents should be tortured ruthlessly. there was no need to do that.
it's so boring here the only thing to talk about IS sedaka, apparently. not that i'm complaining. i miss ye olde days of flamewarring. i wish there could be some new development though. some scandal to really get castaways all worked up. i have three more weeks of boredom coming up, dammit, and this just isn't cutting it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matheus on Aug 4, 2007 10:04:09 GMT -5
I gotta admit... I do like a good flamewar...
Just make up something scandalous and get the ball rolling.
|
|
|
|
Post by samplestiltskin on Aug 4, 2007 10:09:52 GMT -5
I had sex with Rocky and he whimpered Riley's name at a rather crucial moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Aug 4, 2007 10:17:20 GMT -5
I just don't care at all about Nicole Richie having a baby.
I agree btw, with chrisfan, even though I'm not sure if she was saying that "we" create the air a secrecy and mysteriousness around sedaka. I don't feel like we do. I've been as open about it as I can possibly be. I agree it's silly that sedaka should be talked about hushed tones as though it's the bastard child or something. Maybe rocdoc has at least one semi-valid point, regardless of what may have happened to bring about it's creation (I still maintain it was inevitable despite that incident) it has become something else. Something that doesn't need polishing or spin or excusing or justification.
|
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Aug 4, 2007 10:17:59 GMT -5
I had sex with Rocky and he whimpered Riley's name at a rather crucial moment. That's old news. |
|
|
|
Post by samplestiltskin on Aug 4, 2007 10:25:39 GMT -5
We're thinking of naming our bastard child Neil.
|
|
|
|
Post by KooL on Aug 4, 2007 10:29:12 GMT -5
I say twins - one of each. So you're predicting they'll have a slut and a moron? |
|
|
|
Post by chrisfan on Aug 4, 2007 12:25:03 GMT -5
Twins! That would be amazing. Personally, I think she's going to have a girl, but that's simply my opinion. I hope she doesn't have a girl. I can' see her dressing a girl in stupid cute little outfits, and trotting her out as a little fashion plate all the time. That would annoy me. So if it's not one of each, I'm hoping for a boy. |
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Aug 4, 2007 13:10:27 GMT -5
You're peach doc, as though the absolute refusal to accept the other as any more than scoundrel is one sided. I ask again then, what difference does it make who wrote it? Explain and I'll be more then happy to tell you who it was. tho i have no idea what the first sentence has to do with the next (actually not much of what it even means), the 'what's the diff' answer is that maarts asked and he was the one interested to know. and you for some reason seem to be saying that you're protecting him (ie We do give a about what Maarts thinks...) You have assumed this entirely. I've never once implied I was protecting Maarts...protecting him from what even? The unserious bit lost steam as soon as you started it. I never said a word of it. ~ Again you've loaded my words with whatever meanings you please. I do indeed consider shin a friend and I a proud member of the sedaka boards. "The truth"? You need help. Of course not. Silly of me to think as aweful as I've been you could remember a time (of many I'm sure) that I'd given you a lashing without provocation. Mind I've given you the chance to rid yourself of me forever and mere laziness shall keep you from it. Tut. rocdoc, why do you let yourself get so worked up over people talking on another message board that you openly despise? Honestly, you need to lay off the Beefeater and Squirts, they're making you unbalanced. You keep lording this "mysterious" disgruntled former poster of Sedaka over everyone's heads as if we have no idea who you're talking about. You're not very fucking subtle. We all know why Layla left, she never was one to mince words, and hey guess what? She didn't hate everyone there. It's not some big fucking secret only you alone are privy to. You're not special. And I'm pretty sure Holzman was invited there a couple years ago, he never asked to come, he was invited, so why you keep blathering on about us backpedaling to "allow" him in is beyond me. I think you're thinking of Phil, and he's still not with us. Not because we all hate him, but because he's a bit of a pervert, and there are pictures of young children on there. You understand. Sedaka is not sinister. Considering it's the internet, we hardly have the ability to shank someone in the back when they're not looking, so I hardly think it matters much that some of us can be cunts. But it's you and you alone who have built this insane conspiracy in your head. And you won't be talked out of it. Good for you. Physical therapists need to have determination and resolve. It's part of your profession. But come on. You once accused me of orchestrating a fake Kathman appearance. You've lost all sense of reality. It's time to step away from the gin and the computer and go spend some time with your family. Maybe little things like separate message boards won't matter so much after that. willful 'no comprende' disingenuousness, along with extreme mischaracterisation of true statements, GROSS exaggeration of my 'legendary' paranoia which sedakan founding fathers have repeated endlessly...and then outright slander. i mean the proven unhinged, now thinking she's got me pegged as 'unhinged', all based on this exchange. uh-huh. the expert. with her long history of abject universal hate and truculence, who's the one in need of professional help here... but this entry is honestly an improvement on her previous droolingly whacked out ones. bravo someone! |
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Aug 4, 2007 13:46:02 GMT -5
I have no idea who or what you're responding to...except to notice you seem to think there is a single truth to things. There isn't. There's how you see things and some of it you have no idea what you're talking about but there's no convincing you otherwise, is there?
|
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Aug 4, 2007 13:52:09 GMT -5
Maybe rocdoc has at least one semi-valid point, regardless of what may have happened to bring about it's creation (I still maintain it was inevitable despite that incident) it has become something else. Something that doesn't need polishing or spin or excusing or justification.
that's my belief at this point, that you DO now have something good happening over there in spite of 'beginnings' or the fact that i have excellent reasons to dislike you, shin and kenny...for the fact that you'll never anywhere ever again give me a fair shake.
but i'm glad you picked up on that, ded.
even tho i've only said it like 10 times, reworded 'you are the mainstream now'.
having fuzz, kool, ryo, ken, mary (and i suppose the canuck contingent too:o) there actually pulls you out of the toilet from which you sprang....and when i say toilet, it's euphemistically refering to pissin' and that siciliano colts fan you've got over there.
|
|
|
|
Post by RocDoc on Aug 4, 2007 13:58:07 GMT -5
I have no idea who or what you're responding to
what, your computer doesn't show you the quoted posts?
and, no, same as i'm NOT going to go search for instances of you ragging me first in some manner on the boards to give you an EZ out, neither am i going to fucking itemize for you where in those bullshit 'retorts' of yours are the instances of:
willful 'no comprende' disingenuousness, along with extreme mischaracterisation of true statements, GROSS exaggeration of my 'legendary' paranoia which sedakan founding fathers have repeated endlessly...and then outright slander.
tho what you just said is to be easily itemized as just another bs 'no comprende' like always.
i've got better things to do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Aug 4, 2007 14:05:07 GMT -5
that's my belief at this point, that you DO now have something good happening over there in spite of 'beginnings' or the fact that i have excellent reasons to dislike you, shin and kenny...for the fact that you'll never anywhere ever again give me a fair shake. You keep saying this as though the reverse isn't true. You have completely written us off and yes over the years we've had enough reason, but it's always been that way. From the first time I tried to talk to you, from the first time we disagreed (which was almost immediately) you were the first to go for the jugular. You keep talking as though you only respond to shin and myself being assholes when the truth is that you've always been trigger happy and we've not backed down. I've admitted we've pushed you at times but you never need much pushing. You can keep acting like you don't know why we dislike you in return but you know why. The way you've treated us us over the years...the way we've treated you...should either us give the other a chance? I've called a truce with you more the once and it never lasts very long. I'd be a fool to accept that you just want to get along now, you've bitten too many times. |
|
