|
Post by rockysigman on Mar 12, 2006 23:46:49 GMT -5
It's time to get off the internet when I'm asking questions about Luke's blown wadFunny though, that you jumped in so quick to ask dude... I was just giving Luke what he wanted...
|
|
|
Post by luke on Mar 13, 2006 0:03:42 GMT -5
Seen enough money shots in my day to know quality.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 13, 2006 8:17:07 GMT -5
I really want a vasectomy, but I've always taken such pride in my massive loads that I just don't know if I can bring myself to do it.
HÉ ! You know what they say ...
The more you practice ...
Luke ~ You really should get some info about the procedure ...
A vasectomy will in no way affect the quantity of seminal fluid being released during an ejaculation ...
It will only block the little buggers (read spermatozoides) from ever mixing with the semen again ...
Been there ... Done that !!
Only side effect is a higher pitch voice for a couple of months ...
Only Kidding !!
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 13, 2006 8:57:24 GMT -5
HOLY FUCKIN' SACRED COWS !! Just Googled "Vasectomy" to get my facts straight ... The second result read like this ... No joke !! My Vasectomy in pictures
A personal description in word and pictures about a vasectomy. Not for the squeamish.
Now that's what I call TMPI ...
|
|
|
Post by luke on Mar 13, 2006 9:28:08 GMT -5
Ah, that's gross.
Yeah, I haven't done tons of research, Phil. Thanks for the words of comfort. I'd really like to look out for it in the next few years. No sense in having kids when we're all probably going to die from nuclear fall-out/global warming/superflu within the next fifty years, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 13, 2006 9:42:21 GMT -5
Bah ! You're still young ...
Maybe it's only a matter of your paternal instinct being a late bloomer ...
Although there is nothing wrong with your idea of not having children but it is a little early in the game ... (IMHO and totaly Not Of My Business anyway ...)
|
|
|
Post by Fuzznuts on Mar 13, 2006 9:55:43 GMT -5
At least he doesn't want kids and knows it, as opposed to the people I see everytime I go to the Jiffy store, people that SHOULD NOT reproduce, but continue to do so.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Mar 13, 2006 10:00:44 GMT -5
Like I said ... Totaly understandable but 20 something is kinda early to make such a drastic decision ...
|
|
|
Post by chrisfan on Mar 13, 2006 10:04:49 GMT -5
Most doctors certainly agree with you Phil. I have a couple of friends who have gone for surgical sterilization in their 20s - one a vasectomy and one tubes tied. Both were denied by several doctors. And in both cases, they already had children. Each had one child, knew they didnt' want anymore, and sought out the surgery. Both had several doctors tell them that they were too young and they wouldn't perfom the surgery, because they may change their minds in the future. The woman eventually got someone to do it when she was about 32, and it was tied into some surgery she had to have for other problems. The guy has yet to have it done - but has revisited the idea of having more kids with his wife.
|
|
|
Post by melon1 on Mar 13, 2006 10:42:42 GMT -5
My apologies for not even having the time to read through most of the thread I started at the moment. All I have time for, even though I'm not in the mood for this at the moment at all, is this:
I need a sentence length, Melon.
Do you? Ok, shin. I considered baiting you by saying a certain amount of time just to see your reaction but that would break my own rule of civility that I promised when I started this board. Even though I started this board in the fashion of actually asking that people challenge me, I'm still going to ask YOU this question before giving an answer:
Under the Endangered Species Act the fetus of the bald eagle is protected by a heavy fine if not jail time(I don't have time to look it up). Do you think the fetus of a bald eagle should be protected under the same power of the law that protects those who wish to abort their own baby even if the head of the baby is out of the birth canal?
|
|
|
Post by chrisfan on Mar 13, 2006 10:47:26 GMT -5
Correction Melon: Head out constitutes birth. I assume that you're referring to partial birth abortion. If that's the case, they turn the baby around, deliver it breach, and all BUT the head is out of the birth canal.
Somehow, the breach delivery does not threaten the life of the mother, but a normal delivery would ...
|
|
|
Post by melon1 on Mar 13, 2006 10:50:26 GMT -5
Wow, I guess it's so sick I only wanted to be told about it once and did the big "Hush! Hush!" the next time someone brought it up. Sadly, Washington is still packed with Congressmen who fought to keep this from being banned and won(Kerry was among them). I don't give a shit what your ideology is! If that doesn't summon "Litmus Test" in you, you are bad off!!! Clinton was a great president, eh? We should just look over the ban thing. Doesn't make him a bad man. Nah.
|
|
|
Post by Kensterberg on Mar 13, 2006 11:02:37 GMT -5
As soon as the human population is in as fragile a state as the few remaining bald eagles, I'll happily support making it a crime to knowingly endanger a human pregnancy.
Human beings are currently the world's most populous large mammal (I'm not sure exactly where "large mammal" begins, but I feel very safe in saying that we are by far the most numerous mammal whose average adult weight exceed ninety pounds). Equating abortion (or any form of population control) with safeguards for endangered species is perhaps the ultimate red herring in this debate. We protect eagle eggs for the reason that each and every potential eagle is vital to the survival of their species, which is something that we recognize as being a net good for our environment, and ultimately ourselves. The loss of any particular potential human being has absolutely zero negative environmental impact.
|
|
|
Post by rockkid on Mar 13, 2006 12:12:30 GMT -5
In response to Mary’s query. People who actually take no time to use any other form of birth control. Copping the attitude “well I can always abort it” That’s what/who I’m against. (& yes that is going on out there believe you me) though rarely thank god.
|
|
|
Post by kmc on Mar 13, 2006 12:26:47 GMT -5
I am always wary to discuss an abortion as irresponsible regardless of circumstance. After all, unless you believe in the sancitity of the fetus or its status as a human being, having an abortion to nullify a pregnancy is technically no different than taking an Advil for a cold.
|
|