|
|
Post by phil on Oct 21, 2006 17:44:50 GMT -5
Great rant BTW ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kensterberg on Oct 21, 2006 18:17:37 GMT -5
WOULD YOU DUMOCRATS RATHER HAVE SADDAM HUSSEIN IN POWER? Yes. Iraq was better off, and so were we. |
|
|
|
Post by rockysigman on Oct 21, 2006 23:11:28 GMT -5
Isn't it just alittle too convenient that he wrote that right before the election? Come on. No, he wrote it right before his brother's birthday.  |
|
|
|
Post by poseidon on Oct 22, 2006 9:35:37 GMT -5
Am looking forward to this years Texas races. Have decided to vote for the independent candidate for Govenor of Texas, Carole Keeton Strayhorn. The current republican Govenor and '06 incumbent, Govenor Rick Perry, is a total dunce and the democratic candidate Chris Bell, is a total wimp. That leaves my choice Carole as the person getting my vote. I usually vote straight democratic party lines, but due to the incompetance of the current Govenor, and the wimpyness of the democratic candidate, I feel that it is in Texas's best interest to vote Carole.
Carole has been state comptroller for many years and has done a remarkable job as state comptroller. I hope she wins. She could really "shake things up" here in Texas.
|
|
|
|
Post by kmc on Oct 22, 2006 10:18:35 GMT -5
I am voting for whatever candidate most closely resembles and acts in a manner befitting the Lord Jesus Christ...or Bill Maher.
|
|
|
|
Post by poseidon on Oct 22, 2006 10:40:29 GMT -5
Are you from Texas kMc?
Looks like Gay Bailey Hutchinson is going to be re-elected Senator...or is that Kay Bailey? Hmmm...
|
|
|
|
Post by kmc on Oct 22, 2006 13:51:25 GMT -5
Oh no, Pat. I am from Virginia. I get to choose between two incompetent racists for Senate.
|
|
|
|
Post by shin on Oct 22, 2006 16:25:55 GMT -5
Patlogi, you're actually going to vote for Chris Bell.
|
|
|
|
Post by poseidon on Oct 22, 2006 20:28:09 GMT -5
No Shin. I'm voting Carole.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kensterberg on Oct 22, 2006 21:01:59 GMT -5
If Bell is w/in striking distance, I'll vote for him. Otherwise, I'm going to vote for Kinky Friedman.
Like his slogan says, why the hell not?
|
|
|
|
Post by shin on Oct 22, 2006 21:56:41 GMT -5
Actually, Patlogi, you're going to vote for the Democrat in the race. It's because he has a "D" next to his name.
|
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Oct 22, 2006 23:04:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by rockysigman on Oct 23, 2006 0:08:36 GMT -5
If Bell is w/in striking distance, I'll vote for him. Otherwise, I'm going to vote for Kinky Friedman. Like his slogan says, why the hell not? Is Kinky actually a semi-serious candidate, or is our nation really such a mess that there's really no reason not to vote for him? I'm not asking to be critical, I'm just really curious. I don't know a thing about that campaign at all, but on its face it seems like Kinky Friedman running for governor shouldn't be that different from when Gallagher ran for governor of California...or when Schwarzennegar ran for that matter, so never mind. |
|
|
|
Post by poseidon on Oct 23, 2006 10:40:12 GMT -5
Kinky has 18% of the polls. The Dunce (Perry) has 35%, more than any other candidate...alas. If Kinky was respectable he would endorse Carole who also, along with Bell maintains 18% of the polls.
|
|
|
|
Post by rockysigman on Oct 23, 2006 11:05:23 GMT -5
I didn't really mean if he had legitimate polling numbers. I was more curious whether or not he had any actual ideas to bring to the table and/or whether he was viewed as a serious candidate by people who base their vote on things other than name recognition.
|
|
