|
|
Post by Paul on Sept 13, 2006 9:48:24 GMT -5
^^^ LOL  |
|
|
|
Post by samplestiltskin on Sept 13, 2006 9:58:34 GMT -5
I have a guy who carries a leash and collar around in his car, just in case he happens to run into me at club. He has no clue how dangerous this is..... Soon the whole world will be on my tight lead and heeling like good little pack animals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Sept 13, 2006 10:12:15 GMT -5
I have a dog collar.
You provide the leash.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul on Sept 13, 2006 10:13:56 GMT -5
I have a guy who carries a leash and collar around in his car, just in case he happens to run into me at club. He has no clue how dangerous this is..... Soon the whole world will be on my tight lead and heeling like good little pack animals. that sounds hot Geez, now I do sound like a dog!!! |
|
|
|
Post by samplestiltskin on Sept 13, 2006 10:39:00 GMT -5
really the dom/sub thing is only fun in certain moods. most of the time i don't give a fuck what anybody does enough to want to control them. it's too much effort. there is a special kind of happiness that comes from jerking a full grown man by the collar to catch up with you. i've met some really good subs lately. they manipulate you just as much as a dom does really. it just melts my heart when they call me mistress... |
|
|
|
Post by Paul on Sept 13, 2006 15:28:39 GMT -5
sounds kinky....
No one has ever put a collar and leash on me, if they did, I'd bite them. Yeah, I'm a real wild one (sarcasim).
|
|
|
|
Post by limitdeditionlayla on Sept 13, 2006 21:05:20 GMT -5
do you guys really think you can tell that much from a handshake? My handshake is firm & brief (minimal contact with other hands = minimal contact with other penises), one shake & thats it. very businesslike, which is kinda the antithesis of my personality.
I tell waaay more from eyes. Eye contact is the key, not least of which because it lets you spot a true smile froma fake one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Sept 14, 2006 13:32:39 GMT -5
I think you can tell lots from both handshakes & eyes.
But an eyeshake = someone on crystal meth
|
|
|
|
Post by limitdeditionlayla on Sept 14, 2006 20:02:24 GMT -5
lmao |
|
|
|
Post by strat-0 on Sept 19, 2006 19:22:25 GMT -5
Avast, ye! Hey, Phil - is there a comparable "pirate dialect" in French? I would expect so, since the French had plenty of dealings with the scurvy dogs.
|
|
|
|
Post by phil on Sept 19, 2006 20:28:31 GMT -5
LoL !! Can't say I'm very familiar with french "pirate dialect" or even if such a thing ever existed ... The French had a tradition of Corsairs but I'm sure there were a bunch of pirates among those ... An English officer who told him that the French Corsairs
fought for the money and the English for the honor,
Robert Surcouf [famous French Corsair] answered him:
"One always fights for what we miss more" ... ;D www.jjsalein.com/bdcorsair/privateers.htm |
|
|
|
Post by samplestiltskin on Sept 20, 2006 9:06:07 GMT -5
That's some rapier wit.
|
|
|
|
Post by sisyphus on Sept 21, 2006 0:34:53 GMT -5
eyeshake....lol
|
|
|
|
Post by phil on Nov 3, 2006 14:15:56 GMT -5
U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer
By WILLIAM J. BROAD
Published: November 3, 2006
Last March, the federal government set up a Web site to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war. The Bush administration did so under pressure from Congressional Republicans who had said they hoped to “leverage the Internet” to find new evidence of the prewar dangers posed by Saddam Hussein.
But in recent weeks, the site has posted some documents that weapons experts say are a danger themselves: detailed accounts of Iraq’s secret nuclear research before the 1991 Persian Gulf war. The documents, the experts say, constitute a basic guide to building an atom bomb.
Last night, the government shut down the Web site after The New York Times asked about complaints from weapons experts and arms-control officials. A spokesman for the director of national intelligence said access to the site had been suspended “pending a review to ensure its content is appropriate for public viewing.”
Officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency, fearing that the information could help states like Iran develop nuclear arms, had privately protested last week to the American ambassador to the agency, according to European diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the issue’s sensitivity. One diplomat said the agency’s technical experts “were shocked” at the public disclosures.
Early this morning, a spokesman for Gregory L. Schulte, the American ambassador, denied that anyone from the agency had approached Mr. Schulte about the Web site.
The documents, roughly a dozen in number, contain charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building that nuclear experts who have viewed them say go beyond what is available elsewhere on the Internet and in other public forums. For instance, the papers give detailed information on how to build nuclear firing circuits and triggering explosives, as well as the radioactive cores of atom bombs.
“For the U.S. to toss a match into this flammable area is very irresponsible,” said A. Bryan Siebert, a former director of classification at the federal Department of Energy, which runs the nation’s nuclear arms program. “There’s a lot of things about nuclear weapons that are secret and should remain so.”
|
|
|
|
Post by rockysigman on Nov 3, 2006 14:20:17 GMT -5
Dude, what a depressing discussion topic for the bar.
|
|
