|
|
Post by Galactus on Mar 17, 2007 19:51:36 GMT -5
PEW doesn't seem to understand what "prove" actually means. We've been through this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Mar 17, 2007 19:52:37 GMT -5
I fell into his trap, that sneaky bastard.
|
|
|
|
Post by KooL on Mar 17, 2007 21:50:19 GMT -5
PEW, this man wants to buy your soul. Look into his eyes...  |
|
|
|
Post by loudaab on Mar 31, 2007 9:51:30 GMT -5
no man who wears guy-liner will ever get my soul... I've read the blog and while you no doubt have a serious beef with them, your examples are dodgy, like: - The Stones start writing their own songs right after the Beatles start writing their own - The Beatles record "Yesterday" a song that uses strings which was a huge deal at the time and the Stones quickly follow with "As Tears Go By". ~The Beatles use a sitar in "Norwegian Wood" and the Stones follow suit by using a sitar in "Paint it Black". Now I know Lennon publicly made it known that he thought the band imitated his (there was no ill will between either party, though). But how the fuck can you be sure when the Stones wrote their songs in relation to when the Beatles wrote theirs? I still don't think the Stones suck after reading your blog. I think certain similarities between both bands are coincidential (and I think the Stones mock the Beatles with their album covers and titles; no evidence, but I think that way) at best. The Stones still sound different and their material is just as engaging as that of the Beatles (especially when both bands were around). |
|
