|
|
Post by phil on Sept 22, 2005 9:59:26 GMT -5
So you're callin my friends Clubber and Pissin "kooks" -?
I don't think that is what was said in that quote !!
|
|
|
|
Post by phil on Sept 22, 2005 10:00:49 GMT -5
Did you just quote yourself?Looks like it !  !
|
|
|
|
Post by InvisibleFloatingTorsoMan on Sept 22, 2005 10:04:32 GMT -5
Hola Phil you big juicy vaca
|
|
|
|
Post by poseidon on Sept 22, 2005 10:05:59 GMT -5
Can trolls try celibate gay priests? I'm sure there are some "trolls" who think they should be able to... 'Fe-Fi-Fo-Troll" |
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Sept 22, 2005 10:13:55 GMT -5
So you're callin my friends Clubber and Pissin "kooks" -?I don't think that is what was said in that quote !! Oh. *Ferget it then* ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Sept 22, 2005 10:14:43 GMT -5
I actually re-read that quote of yours strat-0 (which I quoted) - - - - - and now I don't have a clue as to what you were actually saying. Maybe I need more coffee * * * * yeah I quoted myself .. . U got a problem wit dat ??   |
|
|
|
Post by poseidon on Sept 22, 2005 10:17:47 GMT -5
I think homosexual organizations need to concentrate on one "area" in the fight for equality. Seems the gay equal rights organizations tend to carry "too much on their plate," "too many irons in the fire at once." Making discrimination based on sexual orientation unconstitutional should be the #1 priority.
Being ordained a gay catholic priest by the church falls low on the totem pole IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Sept 22, 2005 10:27:09 GMT -5
The best part about being asleep at the wheel is that these boards are all one way. *def need more coffee* / excuse my impolitic, inaccurate observations But I still think anyone who bans the ClubberLang sux!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by riley on Sept 22, 2005 11:04:56 GMT -5
I'm Clubber's defense attorney, so back off. Didn't you see my post from yesterday talking about my cool new lawyer style suit. Do the pre-work Onion nuts. Come on.
If you're not prepared to invest the required time in these threads then I'm not going to side track the topics with childish drivel. This is a relationship. We don't have to rodger one another, but we owe it to one another to stay current.
|
|
|
|
Post by riley on Sept 22, 2005 11:08:52 GMT -5
do it for these guys  |
|
|
|
Post by phil on Sept 22, 2005 11:11:49 GMT -5
Hola Phil you big juicy vaca
Big juicy vaca... ??
As soon I manage to understand
what that means exactly,
expect a call from my lawyer ...
(gets in line to have his day in court ...)
|
|
|
|
Post by Galactus on Sept 22, 2005 11:12:42 GMT -5
or you'd prefer, these guys...  |
|
|
|
Post by poseidon on Sept 22, 2005 11:15:18 GMT -5
do it for these guys O.K. Riley, I'll try to stay on topic. Yes! I'll do it for Daryl and J.R. oops...I mean John!!  |
|
|
|
Post by Thorngrub on Sept 22, 2005 11:38:34 GMT -5
Man, when you put it that way Riley . . . I'll do it: for John.
|
|
|
|
Post by maarts on Sept 22, 2005 17:32:33 GMT -5
Forget the coffee, I need flamin' Nurofen to get through this board!
|
|
!
